A brand of BritixoShadow AI. Clear accountability.

Guide · reviewed 21 October 2026

Screen for prohibited practices before approval.

A prohibited-practice question needs its own review. It should not be hidden inside a general risk score or treated as a concern that can always be accepted by a business owner.

By EUAIC editorial team · Updated

Check the conditions of the actual prohibition.

Article 5 addresses specified practices, including harmful manipulation or exploitation, certain social scoring, some biometric uses and workplace or educational emotion recognition, subject to the legal wording and exceptions. The amended text also adds prohibitions concerning certain non-consensual intimate synthetic content and child sexual abuse material from 2 December 2026.

Use the current official provision. Short labels are useful for triage but can omit important conditions, exceptions or applicability dates.

Describe what the system actually does.

Ask which inputs are used, which characteristics are inferred, how the output influences behaviour or treatment and who may be affected. Identify the relevant setting and the proposed purpose. A reassuring product name does not answer these questions.

Keep examples factual and proportionate. A reviewer usually needs a description of the functionality and decision process, not a collection of harmful or sensitive sample material copied into a general governance folder.

Make uncertainty a visible decision point.

Where a credible prohibited-practice concern appears, assign the issue to the appropriate legal and operational reviewers. Record any interim restriction and identify who can authorise a change in status. Do not allow an unresolved question to disappear when the procurement or project workflow advances.

  • The specific functionality and intended setting.
  • The concern and relevant provision being examined.
  • Facts confirmed, facts missing and responsible reviewers.
  • The decision, restrictions and evidence supporting it.

Connect the outcome to the system record.

If a proposed use cannot proceed, record the boundary clearly enough that it is not reintroduced under another project name. If a use is allowed within specific conditions, make those conditions visible to the operational owner and revisit them when the purpose changes.

EUAIC can help structure the screening and escalation record. The software workflow does not grant an exemption or permission to conduct a prohibited practice. Formal interpretation should be obtained from appropriately qualified advisers.

Sources & further reading

Useful answers

Before you take the next step.

Practical details to help you discuss your requirements.

Does calling a tool high-risk make a prohibited use acceptable?

No. Prohibited-practice screening and high-risk classification are separate questions. A high-risk label does not authorise a prohibited activity.

Can a supplier declaration settle the question?

It can be evidence, but assess the actual functionality and deployment. Ask for the reasoning and relevant facts behind the declaration.

Start with the right questions

Tell us what you need to achieve.

Share your current setup, priorities and intended outcome. The Britixo team will help define the scope, responsibilities and next steps.

Discuss your requirementsBritixo MyAccountVerify your email. Send your enquiry. Keep your reference.

Explore services and practical guidance.

Search matching runs in your browser. Press Esc to close. Browse every page ↗